Comments on: Fluent Email in .NET http://lukencode.com/2010/04/11/fluent-email-in-net/ code first, ask questions later Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:35:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Luke Lowrey http://lukencode.com/2010/04/11/fluent-email-in-net/comment-page-1/#comment-443 Luke Lowrey Sat, 19 Feb 2011 03:08:39 +0000 http://lukencode.com/?p=80#comment-443 Nice api, I like the template stuff. Was thinking of trying to do something with razor for fluent email templates. Nice api, I like the template stuff. Was thinking of trying to do something with razor for fluent email templates.

]]> By: DaTribe http://lukencode.com/2010/04/11/fluent-email-in-net/comment-page-1/#comment-442 DaTribe Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:59:53 +0000 http://lukencode.com/?p=80#comment-442 Check out this fluent API for .NET 4.0 http://www.avantprime.com/products/view-product/8/fluent-mail Check out this fluent API for .NET 4.0
http://www.avantprime.com/products/view-product/8/fluent-mail

]]> By: User Control Email Templates in asp.net « lukencode http://lukencode.com/2010/04/11/fluent-email-in-net/comment-page-1/#comment-31 User Control Email Templates in asp.net « lukencode Tue, 13 Apr 2010 08:45:22 +0000 http://lukencode.com/?p=80#comment-31 [...] Below is how I use the templates in my code, sending using a basic email sender class I have (or better still fluent email). [...] [...] Below is how I use the templates in my code, sending using a basic email sender class I have (or better still fluent email). [...]

]]> By: Luke Lowrey http://lukencode.com/2010/04/11/fluent-email-in-net/comment-page-1/#comment-30 Luke Lowrey Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:44:07 +0000 http://lukencode.com/?p=80#comment-30 @Kane - what do you mean by "progressive fluent" this is the first fluent interface I've attempted and I'd like to find out. @Kane – what do you mean by “progressive fluent” this is the first fluent interface I’ve attempted and I’d like to find out.

]]> By: Luke Lowrey http://lukencode.com/2010/04/11/fluent-email-in-net/comment-page-1/#comment-29 Luke Lowrey Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:43:07 +0000 http://lukencode.com/?p=80#comment-29 @Dan Yeah dan thats .NET 4. I wanted to get something up quickly, If I do continue to work on it I think I will move it to 3.5 @Dan
Yeah dan thats .NET 4. I wanted to get something up quickly, If I do continue to work on it I think I will move it to 3.5

]]> By: Luke Lowrey http://lukencode.com/2010/04/11/fluent-email-in-net/comment-page-1/#comment-28 Luke Lowrey Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:42:18 +0000 http://lukencode.com/?p=80#comment-28 @Bret cool bret, is it open sourced somewhere? What I've done so far is more of a proof of concept, I'd like to create/find something a bit more robust. @Bret
cool bret, is it open sourced somewhere? What I’ve done so far is more of a proof of concept, I’d like to create/find something a bit more robust.

]]> By: André Carrilho http://lukencode.com/2010/04/11/fluent-email-in-net/comment-page-1/#comment-27 André Carrilho Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:08:37 +0000 http://lukencode.com/?p=80#comment-27 Hi, Very nice implementation. I've done something similar missing only async sending. You can check it out here: http://acarrilho.com/acarrilhograffiti/dot-net/my-net-c-global-class-does-almost-everything/ and in more detail here (with bulk sending): http://acarrilho.com/acarrilhograffiti/dot-net/a-new-feature-on-the-mailhelper-class/ Basically it's an assembly with a bunch of functionalities: HttpHelper, RestHelper, SerializerHelper (XmlSerializer and DataContractSerializer), MailHelper (Fluent API) and others. Cheers Hi,

Very nice implementation. I’ve done something similar missing only async sending. You can check it out here:

http://acarrilho.com/acarrilhograffiti/dot-net/my-net-c-global-class-does-almost-everything/

and in more detail here (with bulk sending):

http://acarrilho.com/acarrilhograffiti/dot-net/a-new-feature-on-the-mailhelper-class/

Basically it’s an assembly with a bunch of functionalities: HttpHelper, RestHelper, SerializerHelper (XmlSerializer and DataContractSerializer), MailHelper (Fluent API) and others.

Cheers

]]> By: Bret Ferrier http://lukencode.com/2010/04/11/fluent-email-in-net/comment-page-1/#comment-26 Bret Ferrier Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:34:17 +0000 http://lukencode.com/?p=80#comment-26 Well I will give you credit for reading the comments to your posts as the Fluent EMail API was my suggestion on your last post. I am glad to see that you put it in action. I have a single class file that I have been using in all of my projects that provides the same API. I just need to add the Async option. Well I will give you credit for reading the comments to your posts as the Fluent EMail API was my suggestion on your last post. I am glad to see that you put it in action. I have a single class file that I have been using in all of my projects that provides the same API. I just need to add the Async option.

]]> By: Dan http://lukencode.com/2010/04/11/fluent-email-in-net/comment-page-1/#comment-25 Dan Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:30:16 +0000 http://lukencode.com/?p=80#comment-25 public Email Body(string body, bool isHtml = true) {} "bool isHtml = true" looks like .net 4.0 syntax... public Email Body(string body, bool isHtml = true)
{}

“bool isHtml = true” looks like .net 4.0 syntax…

]]> By: Kane Barton http://lukencode.com/2010/04/11/fluent-email-in-net/comment-page-1/#comment-24 Kane Barton Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:06:35 +0000 http://lukencode.com/?p=80#comment-24 If you are going to make fluent interfaces then please make sure that they are "progressive fluent" interfaces. The whole point for fluent interfaces is discoverability and without the progressive part discoverability is somewhat lost. Cheers Kane If you are going to make fluent interfaces then please make sure that they are “progressive fluent” interfaces. The whole point for fluent interfaces is discoverability and without the progressive part discoverability is somewhat lost.

Cheers
Kane

]]>